Fooled by Perception
It is natural to think that our perceptions are the ultimate reality because they are immediate to our experience.
But do we know of anything outside of our own perceptions?
Things, from the very large to the very small, do not actually exist until they are observed.
The house next door does not exist until it is perceived. The palm of your hand does not exist until you perceive it.
Amazing, isn't it?
But these things are not physical things and therefore don't need to take on physical properties. It's okay that your friends don't exist until you perceive them because they exist entirely in your perception. Perception is simply what we experience when two or more things relate. We perceive this "geometry" of relationships and it is really all we ever knew.
We forget how we have come to perceive anything. We mistake a representation of a thing with the actual thing and forget that we did just that. We have become so familiar with this 'geometry' that it seems like reality.
Imagine a baby, learning a language for the first time. The words make no sense at first. It's just noise. But after the baby begins to relate the words with other words, concepts, actions, expressions, etc., it all makes sense. Finally, the words they hear are rich and become so ingrained in their experience that they could not imagine a world without them.
And so it is the same with these geometrical relationships.
Something can either be true, or it can be perceived. It cannot be both. We can be aware of something but not be aware of the truth of what it is. When the totality of something cannot be grasped in our perception, it appears infinite (such is your reality, seemingly infinite in every direction).
Consciousness and Being Human
Consciousness,
or awareness, is the difference between two or more representations.
We are only aware of something because we compared it with something else.
We are only "aware" of ourselves because of these other things. This relationship is what we call consciousness.
You
cannot possibly be aware of something directly. We only know of something in relation
to other things. (Other things that cannot be directly perceived, as well.)
Consciousness does not actually exist. You are not aware of anything directly, including "you".
For example, when you look at the Sun you are actually perceiving it as it existed in the past (approximately 8 minutes ago). Similarly, the moon, the house across the street, and your hand. It seems like "now" but it's not. You are also not looking at your hand directly but interpreting signals in your brain. We can only be aware of things indirectly through their relationship with other things.
Thus, humanness is a state of mind rather than a state of physicality.
Your
change because your interactions with other representations change.
We
have as many consciousnesses as we have representations. Who you think you are
is but a fraction of your complete bodily consciousness.
Our
physical body is a massive collection of both physical and non-physical consciousness.
(In a similar manner, our mind operates in both physical and non-physical stages.)
Approximately 100 trillion bacterial cells, each with its own individual consciousness
and thoughts, inhabit our body. We have 10 times more bacterial cells in
our body than human cells. What we refer to as human DNA actually has more than
1,000 times more microbial genes than what we think of as human genes. We are,
in reality, not human.
As
soon as we are born, bacteria move in. They stake claims in our digestive and
respiratory tracts, our teeth, our skin. They establish increasingly complex communities,
like a forest that gradually takes over a clearing. By the time were a few
years old, these communities have matured, and we carry them with us, more or
less, for our entire lives. Our bodies harbor 100 trillion bacterial cells, outnumbering
our human cells 10 to one. Its easy to ignore this astonishing fact.
...Human
beings are not really individuals; theyre communities of organisms,
says McFall-Ngai. Its not just that our bodies serve as a habitat for other
organisms; its also that we function with them as a collective. As the profound
interrelationship between humans and microbes becomes more apparent, the distinction
between host and hosted has become both less clear and less important together
we operate as a constantly evolving man-microbe kibbutz. Which raises a startling
implication: If being Homo sapiens through and through implied a certain authority
over our corporeal selves, we are now forced to relinquish some of that control
to our inner-dwelling microbes. Ironically, the human ingenuity that drives us
to understand more about ourselves is revealing that were much less human
than we once thought. [from "The
Body Politic"]
To
you, an aggregated consciousness, riding a bicycle is a simple activity. It does,
however, require the rapid execution of successive calculations of physics, trigonometry,
and calculus. Calculations that would be quite impossible for anyone to do (rapidly,
if at all) with their brain are easily and quickly performed by the other types
of consciousnesses in their person. You quite often and easily perform calculus
at speeds that would make Isaac Newton sweat. We take these abilities (or consciousnesses)
for granted and say that it just comes naturally to us, without ever actually
knowing how we do it. Other types of animals have also been
shown to perform calculus. (Perhaps researchers never thought to apply the
same question to humans fetching balls or doing any sort of physical task.)
We
can perform calculations of physics without thinking about them because parts
of us do make those calculations. We are then "intuitively aware" of the result because the consciousness that has figured it out has formed a relationship with us.
These microbes pass from one person to another, and from system to system. If, for example, a microbe in your body has figured out how to perform a certain feat it could spread to other people. They would then know how to perform the same feat (or have the same idea, thought, etc) because they have become "infected" with the microbe.
How Does Consciousness Work?
Think
of your consciousness like a book. Each word in the book represents a concept.
Then words are grouped together into related concepts. You know what each word
means but there is no meaning and life until you put them together. The meaning
of all these words is determined by the relationship between the words. Similarly,
you are aware of each part of your self but there is no consciousness until the
parts begin to relate. What we think of as awareness arises from relationships.
Now
imagine that a small portion of the words in the book changes constantly. At every
moment a new batch is added, shifted, or taken away. At each of these moments
the book changes into a slightly different form, altering your awareness. If you
were alert and able to read as fast as the book was being changed it would seem
as though everything were happening "now". If you were not as alert
and unable to read as fast as the changes, it would seem as though a new entity,
"past" was being created. Then you may realize the level of your awareness
depended not upon the speed of your reading, but upon how involved you are in
the drama the words illustrate. Some stories in the book you find more interesting
than others so you focus on those words more. Suddenly, it appears as though these
dramas are "close" to you in space and time while others appear more
distant.
To
use another example, if you have a well-kept house and decide to not fix a second-floor
window that was recently broken then the relationship of that window to its environment
will change. It will change the other windows because
they will also adopt this representation of "brokenness" to some degree.
The entire property can be affected by this small change in relationships.
These relationships are integral to our universe and oue lives. We naturally want to create relationships
with something... anything. We constantly seek out opportunities to create
a relationship with someone or something else to further the illusion of our existence.
A person, place, thing, idea, anything that is or can be represented. We give
names to this consciousness-creating process: love, lust, hate, obsession, laughter,
passion, anger, fetish, happiness, etc. It doesn't matter what kind of relationship
it is. We create relationships in order to feel like we exist.
When
you interact with something you are sharing a relationship with it. You must first
be aware of something (to any degree) in order to interact with it. Consciousness is interaction.
We
cannot be aware of something without interacting with it somehow. Anything
you are aware of you are interacting with. For example, we cannot see a distant star without a photon from it interacting
directly with our sense of sight. You cannot smell dinner on a plate without the
molecules in the food interacting with your olfactory neurons. Similarly, we cannot
think of someone else without their representation(s) directly interacting with
our thoughts. Talking to someone on a telephone may sound like their voice but
it is, instead, a representation of their voice. Talking to them in person is also a representation of their voice (our brain's representation). Looking
at someone it may appear that you are seeing them for what they are but you are,
instead, looking at your brain's representation of them. These things are not
the things themselves, but representations.
Your
body is most relative to your perspective, so you perceive that more constantly
than you do your home, surroundings, spouse, etc.
Everything that you know is
in your perception. Every perception is uniquely yours. Every perception is you. And since
there is nothing but You to perceive, there is no you. Don't try to trick yourself
by asking your friends what they perceive. They can tell you that they see something
different but your friends and their words still exist in your perception.
I often hear people talk about how they believe that they create their own reality but don't see how they create what they think of as the negative things.
Perhaps they think when their body gets sick, somehow they did not make it so.
That when they stub their toe, somehow it was the object's fault or they simply didn't see it.
It's not that these things are created in their reality. Or that they create their reality. Nothing is really created. But everything is perceived.
Creation doesn't exist. We use these terms to reference some other process.
If we write a poem, for example, we're not creating something new. We're simply exploring relationships. The words were already there but it becomes relevant to us because we are creating a poem for ourselves.
When something new happens, it is the same thing. You are exploring a relationship. The elements were there already but you are in a way "seeing what happens" when you combine one thing with another thing.
It doesn't actually matter what you perceive, as long as you perceive something.
The idea is to "form relationships". However, the value of each relationship is not the same as the perception of it.
In this sense, at times it may be "better" to perceive of something you consider very bad than something very good.
You're looking at the shape of the relationship, not what your brain interprets the relationship to look like today.
What do we perceive? We perceive of things most relative to us in the here/now. Things not as relative to us are more distant in time/space.
So, your body is most relative to your perspective. So it seems that it's always following you around. Your toes are not as relative to your perspective as your nose and mouth are, and are further away in distance.
Your watch is sometimes relative to your perspective so you may only wear it sometimes.
Your workplace is less relative to your perspective, so it is even more distant.
And so on...
However, it is about the value rather than the perception. The place you grew up or went to school may be very relative to your current perspective but be distant in time space. But what you don't see is that the "shape" of your school or hometown is still around you in a different form.
When we are talking with a friend we must ask ourselves, "What is it that we're doing?" Are we talking with a friend or exploring our own values?
When we perceive of a distant object, is it that the photons from the object are hitting the cells in our eyes or that the distant object is us; a less-relative value in our perspective and we only interpret distance in such a way? 
How Do My Thoughts Become Reality?
You do not think your thoughts but perceive them. You choose to perceive
them, if you will. Thoughts are sensations, like smells or visual stimuli. It's
kind of like drinking milk with your eyes closed. Everything in your environment
says that you will perceive the sensation of milk in your mouth. Similarly, everything
in your perspective enables you to perceive exactly the next thought you will
have. Your thoughts are the logical result of the relationships in your perspective.
Similar
representations tend to group together and become realms of consciousness and
experience. The closer a representation is to a grouping the more powerful is
the realm's affect. (From the graphic to the right, an "emotional" representation
can become more attracted to the physical realm and take on physical properties.
A physical representation can be attracted to or repelled by the microbial
realm and take on or discard microbial properties, etc.)
But
what does that mean for us?
Imagine
a distant object as a thought which has not taken on physical attributes and a
near object as that which is relative to our physicality. You could say that the
distant object is indeed a physical thing. In some ways that would be so.
It is not really, however, in your physical realm of experience and is to your
perspective somewhere between physical and not-physical.
Thoughts
take on physical form as the thought is expressed more physically, changing
your perception of it. Bring the thought into your physical experience and you
will experience it physically. This could be as simple as drawing a picture of
the house you want instead of just desiring it. You are physicalizing the thought,
re-representing it.

|